Since the last major post, I have acquired 3 USB microscopes. These are not full-fledged microscopes, but devices that have zoom factors and light sources. One comes with screenshot/video recording software. I used this to examine a phonograph needle on my turntable. I had enough detail to determine the source of a playback problem. As a result, I purchased a new stylus and now enjoy my LP collection.
Playing with a Canon S200 Digital Elf digital camera. The camera is a 'pocket' camera and came with a leather case with belt loop. I have a 2Gb CF card I share between the Elf and a Konica-Minolta Maxim 5D digital camera that has shutter problems. The 5D is long out of production, but I got lucky and found a digital service manual for the camera.
I've become aware of widespread disinformation on HDR. Reviewers of video products and software make claims based on an incomplete and faulty understanding of HDR. HDR does this, HDR does that, HDR will do this and that. Many such people do not understand the difference between an HDR image and the compressor that makes the image viewable and printable. The HDR is the attempted storage of an aspect of 'reality'. This 'reality' is too much for computer displays and printers so someone writes compression software to make the HDR acceptable, i.e., viewable on monitors and printable on printers. There are an infinite number of ways to do this. The HDR image you see and like so much may have been compressed by a different method than the same HDR another person may see, resulting in two visually different images. This boils down to a matter of interpretation. Much of what is being attributed to HDR images is really the effe...
Comments
Post a Comment